- Which organization/s are significant sources of research funding?
- What does the normal science funding/policy decision-making process look like?
- Which patient advocacy groups, if any, are active in the area?
- Are there existing national/regional organizations that work towards improving research funding/policy?
- How do scientists currently contribute to the existing funding/policy-making/advocacy process, if at all?
- When are science funding/policy decisions made?
- What kinds of opportunities exist for scientists to interact with funders and policymakers?
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
- Australian Research Council (ARC)
Private funding/Foundations/Charity groups:
- Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia (ORIA)
- Retina Australia
- Perpetual Trustees
The funding for major research projects comes from NHMRC and, to a lesser extent, the ARC. These are extremely competitive and are based on the scientific quality of the project, its feasibility and track record of the team. The decisions are made by expert panels which have broader bases than larger countries - there are no pure ophthalmic/vision science panels. Applications are by invitation only and are once a year.
The Australian Society for Medical Research advocates for medical science.
Organisations that advocate for medical research include Science and Technology Australia, the Australian Neuroscience Society, the Macular Disease Foundation and the Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia (ORIA).
Through membership of the above-mentioned societies.
Generally these are made annually.
- Can scientists invite decision makers to their lab/institution to see their work firsthand?
- Do the funding/policy organizations hold open meetings or solicit comments from the public that researchers can participate in?
The NHMRC has a 15-member Community and Consumer Advisory Group of consumer and community leaders in Australia.
Contributors: Mark Gillies MB BS, PhD, FRANZCO (University of Sydney)