Search Results for

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 results
  1. Abstract Rejection Criteria

    Abstract Rejection Criteria The Annual Meeting Program Committee (AMPC) seeks high-quality abstracts that contain a clear statement of hypothesis, an explanation of methods, a report of data that unequivocally test the hypothesis and a brief discussion of their implications. Spelling and grammar must be correct.    The Annual Meeting Program Committee has established the following criteria to determine the rejection of abstracts. The decision of the AMPC is final.    1.1 There is concern in

  2. Members-in-Training Outstanding Poster Awards

    Members-in-Training Outstanding Poster Awards   MIT First Authors of the top five (5) scored abstracts scheduled as Poster presentations from each Scientific Section and Cross-sectional Group will be eligible for consideration as award recipients and invited to participate in the MIT Outstanding Poster Award Competition during the Annual Meeting. One award recipient will be selected from each Scientific Section and Cross-Sectional Group. Each recipient will receive a $100 award and an award

  3. ARVO Abstract Citation Statement

    ARVO Abstract Citation Statement As of May 27, 2002 ARVO publications:   The ARVO Board of Trustees on May 4, 2002, approved the following abstract citation policy for its journals,  Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science and Journal of Vision, and Translational Vision Science and Technology. Effective with June 1, 2002 manuscript submissions, all citations to ARVO abstracts are to appear parenthetically within the text, not as bibliographic references, using the following format: (

  4. Abstracts

    Abstract submission will close on Nov. 30